Finale printmusic vs finale1/5/2023 ![]() ![]() That combined with being able to work quickly and not wanting to learn a new piece of software keep me with Finale. I have been using it for all of my composition/arranging life (maybe 10 years, +/-)Īlthough the learning curve is high the ability to customize is great enough to keep me from moving to other programs. That being said, I’m aware of the sunk cost fallacy and am monitoring developments with other platforms, particularly Dorico, as Finale does create barriers for creation with it’s laborious interface. ![]() It’s very difficult for me to imagine switching to a different notation software when I have so much expertise on one so powerful. I have been using Finale since version 2.7 in the early 1990’s. It does more or less what I need it to do (and sometimes I need it to do pretty unusual or heterodox things!).įinale is the top of the line, I wouldn’t dream of using anything else. It does all it really needs to do to create great looking scores. It may take some workarounds to get there, but with a little customization and input from the community you can do anything with it quickly.įinale is a great program but has a high learning curve and is not as modern feeling as it could be (from a user perspective). Still finding quicker ways within the program to input music.įinale has the capacity to do anything you need short of some very heavy graphic notation. A lot of my comfort level with the program comes from the fact that I have such a level of familiarity with it. I’ve been using Finale since I was in high school (over 25 years). I prize it particularly for the flexibility of its engraving, allowing me to realize any of the wacky notation schemes I can imagine. I started with Musescore and still go back to it every once in a while because it is much easier to move notes around in. The few problems I have had were easy to fix with the help of their customer service department.įinale is the primary software I use mainly because I work for a hymn publisher. Generally speaking, I have encountered very few problems. Please comment on your experience with Finale Overall, most users agree that it is the industry standard, and while it is not as easy to use as other programs, it allows composers and engravers to create nearly any type of notation. Still, others are not satisfied customers, using terse responses that indicate their disappointment with the software. Many users have colleagues who encourage them to switch, but some of the respondents don’t like the quality or capabilities of programs such as MuseScore or Sibelius. These users for the most part prefer the power to the ease of use, but some use MuseScore or other programs to supplement their Finale work. Most of the Finale users in the survey agree that Finale is more powerful, but Sibelius is easier to use. Many also say that they have invested so much time and effort into the software that switching programs seems too burdensome. In general, Finale users are happy with the software, primarily because it affords the ability to make scores as detailed and complex as they like. What Finale Users Think, and What Their Peers Think About Finale Table of Contents Section 1: What Finale Users Think, and What Their Peers Think About Finale Section 1a: Please comment on your experience with Finale Section 1b: What do your friends/fellow musicians say about Finale? Section 2: What Sibelius Users Think, and What Their Peers Think About Sibelius Section 2a: Please comment on your experience with Sibelius Section 2b: What do your friends/fellow musicians say about Sibelius? The result is that while almost all of the comments make sense, some are a little out of context. out of context to the respondent’s prior responses. In order to preserve anonymity, I have left these as-is, i.e. Some respondents referenced their previous responses in these comments, so they may say something like “see above” or “as I said previously”. Take a look and see for yourself! These are unedited comments. Many users agree that Finale sacrifices some ease of use in exchange for greater functionality, and that Sibelius sacrifices some functionality in exchange for greater ease of use. I think you will find these comments quite interesting some reinforce the ideas of strengths and weaknesses of Finale and Sibelius, and others expose many cracks in the typical narrative that Finale is clunky and Sibelius is great. ![]() The comments from respondents who allowed me to publish their feedback are below. As part of the music notation software survey (see post Music Notation Software User Reviews), I collected comments from 48 Finale users and 74 Sibelius users. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |